Capital Punishment Should Be Abolished Argumentative Essay

Death penalty essays tend to examine the arguments in favor and against capital punishment, which is a subject for a long-lasting debate across the world. Pro death penalty essay usually provides well-grounded reasons for the approval of this procedure, while essay against death penalty presents capital punishment as an immoral and unjustified act. Against death penalty essay usually argues that capital punishment should not be legalized at all costs, because it violates the religious dogmas and also because it is unethical and unreasonable. The following death penalty essay will examine the arguments in favor and against capital punishment to end up with a reasonable and justified conclusion as for whether death penalty should be adopted across the world. The paper below represents a death penalty pros and cons essay, which neither approves nor disapproves capital punishment but rather gives readers a chance to decide for themselves. Death penalty argumentative essay presented below focuses on the issue of capital punishment specifically in the United States. Death penalty remains a questionable matter that provokes much debate among the ruling authorities of many countries around the world.

The following death penalty persuasive essay will provide a few serious arguments with an aim to persuade the public that the issue of capital punishment should be solved in the nearest future. The current argumentative essay on death penalty will emphasize that all countries should take responsibility for the consequences of death penalty legalization in a number of ways. Even though capital punishment has been abolished by more than a hundred countries across the world, it still remains a debatable issue. The current essay on death penalty is an attempt to clarify whether death penalty is a justifiable procedure or not. Capital punishment is regarded as the most serious punishment on the planet. The following essay about death penalty will start from examining the cons of capital punishment by providing arguments against this procedure. It needs to be noted that it is doubtful that the civilized society of modern days should take off people’s life even if a person has committed a serious crime. Let us discuss the arguments against death penalty.

                Cons:

  • Capital punishment is a direct violation of human rights that are given to people in order to lead a normal life. Human rights are considered one of the most important rights provided to individuals. The basic right of any person is a right to life, be it criminal or not. People should not violate the right to life irrespective of the crimes committed by this or that individual.
  • Death penalty is associated with ethical, social and racial biases. It is considered that such kind of punishment is biased in many respects. This is proved by the statistics according to which nearly 50% of individuals subjected to death penalty are African Americans. That is why capital punishment is considered to be based on racial stereotypes that should not be part of the legal process.
  • Wrongful subjection to capital punishment is another argument against this procedure. No one is perfect and so are the judges. It can often be observed that innocent people are wrongfully subjected to punishment. A lot of people become victims of such wrongful execution and this leads to the loss of trust and faith towards justice and legal authorities among the citizens. It goes without saying that life of a human being is precious and it should not be taken away without legal grounds. The errors in judicial system often lead to irrevocable consequences. Therefore, it can be assumed that capital punishment should not be made legal.
  • Another argument against death penalty is an assumption that people should be given a second chance under any circumstances. Humans are considered to be imperfect beings. Everyone should therefore be given a second chance to be able to correct their behavior and become better. Even if a person has committed a serious crime, he/she should be granted such a privilege. We are all human beings and the personality of an individual should not be judged according to his/her acts. They should be given a chance to improve themselves, because the primary purpose of justice is to remove crime from the society, but not to take away people’s life.

Pros:

  • Among the arguments in favor of capital punishment is the fact that death penalty is perceived by some people as retribution for one’s deeds. Justice requires following the saying “Tooth for a tooth and an eye for an eye”. It is the most serious argument in favor of death penalty. If a criminal commits an act resulting in personal gains, the system of justice should take care to remove this individual from the society. The person should therefore be punished as intensely as the crime he/she has committed. If the person dares to lay hands on the welfare of the society, he/she should be deprived of the privilege of being a part of the society in order to ensure comfort and wellbeing of all people.
  • Another argument is that by subjecting people to capital punishment, the justice system shows that all crimes will be strictly punished, and this makes criminals be afraid of the consequences of their deeds. This is similar to the fear of going to Hell after death. And this is exactly what is supposed to stop individuals from doing something unethical or immoral. The fear of losing one’s life makes people be cautious in their actions.
  • One more argument is that less damage will prevent greater harm. A criminal is similar to a rotten fruit among the good ones. Those who commit crimes are like stains on the face of the society. And they can infect other people with the similar disease. Therefore, they should be deprived of their lives in order to ensure that other people do not follow their example. All humans live in a civilized society, so that no one should be allowed to commit inhuman acts which might cause damage or discomfort to other individuals. That is why death penalty is considered the best way to get rid of the infectious individuals and remove them from the society. This should be done before these individuals have a chance to pass their unethical and immoral beliefs to other people.

Did you like the essay? You can order one on our website. Don’t miss a chance to get qualified help from a professional writing service.

Topic

Capital punishment should be abolished. Do you agree or disagree with this statement.

This essay was submitted by one of our students. It may contain spelling and grammar mistakes. It is merely provided as a sample.

Response

Capital Punishment has always been a subject of long and grueling debates amongst intellectuals and philosophers since the dawn of history.

Supporters of capital punishment argue that such a method of punishment is very effective in deterring criminals from committing murder. Also, from justice point of view, capital punishment is regarded as the just and logical punishment for murderers. As for the victim’s family, it serves as an opportunity to take revenge for their murdered loved ones.

However, critics view capital punishment as immoral. Since killing as an act on its own is a condemned one, this exclusive right of the government to kill would spark many moral dilemmas. In addition, statistics have proved that capital punishment, regardless of the method, has failed to control the number of murder cases in many countries. In reality, there has been no established pattern that would support the claim that capital punishment serves as a tool to reduce murder cases. For example, in Scandinavian countries, where capital punishment had been abolished, the number of murder cases per capita is one of the least in the world. Hence, it is hard to say that capital punishment was the reason for this astounding result. In a country like the USA, murder cases are numerous despite capital punishment.

In conclusion, Capital punishment has failed to serve its purpose. This established through facts and statistics. In addition to being an immoral method of establishing order, it portrays governments as criminals. It is rather prosperity that can control violence in the world. After all, humans tend to do the right thing; it is circumstances that compel them to commit the evil.

Remarks

This is a good essay. However, there are several mistakes in it. The essay is not divided into five paragraphs. The introduction is too short whereas one of the body paragraph is too long. Also the student forgot to state his opinion in the introduction.

Overall, this seems to be a band 7 – 7.5 essay.

Related posts:

  1. The three parts of your IELTS essay
  2. IELTS essay: Do you think that moving abroad for better jobs is good?
  3. Band 8 IELTS essay sample: children should be taught the importance of money

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *